|
RULES OF INTERPRETATION When reading the Davis-Stirling Act, you should apply the following general rules of interpretation: 1. Statute Overrides CC&Rs. If the statute uses words such as "notwithstanding any provision of the governing documents to the contrary" or any similar language, the statute overrides the association's CC&Rs. For example, Civil Code §1366(b) starts with "Notwithstanding more restrictive limitations placed on the board by the governing documents . . . " and then goes on to set a 20% limit on raising regular dues and a 5% limit on special assessments. This means that if your CC&Rs have a 10% cap on regular dues and a 3% cap on special assessments, they were nullified by statute and the higher limits of 20% and 5% now prevail. Another example is found in Civil Code §1360.5(a):
2. Statute Defers to CC&Rs. If the statute uses words such as "Unless the declaration otherwise provides . . . " or similar language, the CC&Rs will prevail. For example, Civil Code §1362 states:
Frequently, highrise condominiums will assign ownership interest (and the payment of dues) according to the square footage of the unit. If the CC&Rs were silent on the issue, then this statute would assign ownership in equal shares. Another example is found in Civil Code 1365.5(a):
3. Statute is Silent. Frequently, the Davis-Stirling Act is silent on which controls, the statute or the CC&Rs, and you must decide from the general language of the statute which controls. For example, Civil Code §1363(a) does not contain any of the language described above, nonetheless, it clearly controls because of its use of the word "shall":
Updated 9/24/2007 | |
| Free Newsletter | Disclaimer | Contact Us Davis-Stirling.com is a product of Adams Kessler PLC and is not sponsored by or affiliated with any governmental agency. Copyright ©2003-2008 ADAMS KESSLER. | |