|
CONSEQUENCES
OF Boards are tempted to classify workers as independent contractors so they can save money by avoiding payroll taxes, health benefits, and workers' compensation insurance. They also avoid benefits like paid sick leave, vacation, or health insurance. Instead, they write the person a check and file a 1099 income form if the check is over $600. However, to do so now is more risky due to the federal government's implementation of its new initiative: Questionable Employment Tax Practice (QETP). Consequences of Misclassification. Under QETP, federal and state auditors scrutinize independent contractor agreements. Whenever there is a question about a worker's classification, governmental agencies start with the presumption that the worker is an employee as defined by Labor Code §3357. If these auditors determine that a worker is improperly classified, the employer may be required to pay penalties, including the following:
Factors for Determining Status. There are a number of factors used to determine whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor. Following are some of the factors used to evaluate a worker's status:
No one factor is conclusive, but, as a general rule, a worker is an independent contractor when the association has the right to control only the result of the work and not the means or methods of performing the work. See IRS Publication 1779 Example. Painters are generally classified as independent contractors because they are hired on a project basis; supply their own painting supplies and equipment; and do not have set working hours where they need to clock in and out. In other words, the painters control the process. However, not all painters are independent contractors. Some (i) work solely for one association and do not seek or advertise for additional work; (ii) the association controls the means by which the painting is performed by instructing the painters where, when, and how to paint; and (iii) the association supplies the painters with supplies. Such painters are employees, not independent contractors. Avoiding Misclassification. To avoid
misclassification, associations should limit the use of "full-time" independent
contractors, and instead hire workers on a specific project basis. Additionally,
associations should treat workers similarly in similar situations. In other
words, if the job duties of two employees are the same or similar, do not hire
one as an independent contractor and the other as a W-2 employee. Further, keep
employment relationships consistent. Do not convert an independent contractor to
a W-2 employee status. Last, use independent contractor agreements
that highlight the components of independent contractor
status so as to withstand the scrutiny of federal and state auditors. Updated by ADAMS KESSLER 8/9/2008 | |
| Free Newsletter | Disclaimer | Contact Us Davis-Stirling.com is a product of Adams Kessler PLC and is not sponsored by or affiliated with any governmental agency. Copyright ©2003-2008 ADAMS KESSLER. | |