|
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Attorney-client communications are privileged and cannot be discovered by opposing party unless waiver has occurred. Privilege is held by the board as a whole and not by individual directors. The privilege may be lost if one or more directors:
L.A. Times. The L.A. Times ran a column in its Sunday Real Estate section with information that many consider erroneous. The authors of the "Associations" column (Nov. 27, 2005, p. K11) commented that discussion by an association's attorney with its management company "constitutes a serious breach of confidentiality." The authors then advised readers that "If your board signed a management company contract relinquishing that privilege by allowing management employees to make direct contact with the attorney, the board should be sued for breach of its fiduciary duty." Contrary Opinion. In my opinion, there is no breach of fiduciary duty and no breach of the attorney-client privilege; such communications are provided for by law:
Thus, confidential communications between legal counsel and the association's management company are privileged.
Recommendation. In
my opinion, owners should NOT rush out and sue their
boards. Directors are volunteers and it is both common
and permissible for managing agents to act as a
liaison between volunteer boards and the association's legal
counsel. In any event, you should seek legal counsel
regarding your particular situation. Updated 8/21/2007 | |
|
Copyright © 2003-2008 ADAMS KESSLER PLC Disclaimer | Davis-Stirling Act | Contact Us Davis-Stirling.com is a product of Adams Kessler PLC and is not sponsored by or affiliated with any governmental agency. | |